On 17.03.16 16:55, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Should we recommend that everyone use tokenize.detect_encoding()?
Likely. However the interface of tokenize.detect_encoding() is not very
simple.
I just found that out
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:59 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> The only reason to read up to two lines was to address the use of
> the shebang on Unix, not to be able to define two competing
> source code encodings :-)
I know. I was just surprised that the PEP was sufficiently vague
I'm happy to accept this PEP as is stands, assuming the authors are
ready for this news. I recommend also implementing the option from
footnote [11] (extend the number-to-string formatting language to
allow ``_`` as a thousans separator).
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Brett Cannon