> That is usually what I can expect in case of tasks executed in parallel on
> different CPUs. But my example should not be the case, due to the GIL. What
> am I missing? Thank you very much, and sorry again for the OT :(
With such finely intermingled thread activity, there might be a fair
bit of
On Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017 07:59:04 Marco Buttu wrote:
> I am really sorry for the OT :-( I asked elsewhere but without any
> answer :-(
> I can not figure out why in this short example the user+sys time is
> bigger than real time. The example executes the task() functions twice,
> with each execu
Cory Benfield writes:
> From a security perspective I think we have to discount the
> possibility of administrator error from our threat model.
I disagree in a certain sense, and in that sense you don't discount it
-- see below.
> A threat model that includes “defend the system against intrus