On 12 June 2017 at 22:05, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 12 June 2017 at 17:47, Martin (gzlist) wrote:
>> Having thought about it a bit more, my preferred option is having the
>> disable be if either LC_ALL or LC_CTYPE vars are exactly 'C', then
>> don't override. Otherwise (including for LANG=C), forc
Thanks!
Le 17 juin 2017 06:19, "Shloub" mailto:shl...@gmail.com>> a
écrit :
2017-06-16 13:32 UTC+02:00, Robert Vanden Eynde
mailto:robertvandeney...@hotmail.com>>:
> Hello, I would like to propose an idea for the language but I don't know
> where I can talk about it.
Hi,
May I suggest Python-i
Welcome Robert. My response below.
Follow-ups to Python-Ideas, thanks. You'll need to subscribe to see any
further discussion.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:32:19AM +, Robert Vanden Eynde wrote:
> In a nutshell, I would like to be able to write:
> y = (b+2 for b = a + 1)
I think this is some
On 16/06/17 12:32, Robert Vanden Eynde wrote:
Hello, I would like to propose an idea for the language but I don't know
where I can talk about it.
Robert, I have replied to this on the "python-ideas" ML.
Regards, E.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python
2017-06-16 19:00 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon :
> Great idea! I had thought about doing something similar to this years ago to
> help diagnose when a test passes in isolation but somehow fails due to one
> of the bazillion of other tests that ran previously (which can be hard to
> narrow down if the fail
2017-06-16 13:32 UTC+02:00, Robert Vanden Eynde :
> Hello, I would like to propose an idea for the language but I don't know
> where I can talk about it.
Hi,
May I suggest Python-ideas?
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Thanks.
___
Hello, I would like to propose an idea for the language but I don't know where
I can talk about it.
In a nutshell, I would like to be able to write:
y = (b+2 for b = a + 1)
Or in list comprehension:
Y = [b+2 for a in L for b = a+1]
Which can already be done like this:
Y = [b+2 for a in L for b
Great idea! I had thought about doing something similar to this years ago
to help diagnose when a test passes in isolation but somehow fails due to
one of the bazillion of other tests that ran previously (which can be hard
to narrow down if the failure is not early on in a test run).
On Fri, 16 Ju
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2017-06-09 - 2017-06-16)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open6034 ( -1)
closed 36405 (+70)
total 42439 (+69)
Open issues wit
Hi,
Last weeks, I worked on a new tool to bisect failing tests because
it's painful to bisect manually reference leaks (I remove as much code
as possible until the code is small enough to be reviewable manually).
See the bisect_test.py script attached to this issue:
http://bugs.python.org/issue29
2017-06-16 10:40 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan :
> As long as it's noted in the "Porting to Python 3.7" section of the
> 3.7 What's New guide, this seems like a sensible change to me.
Yes, the change is already documented there:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/845/files
Victor
___
On 16 June 2017 at 14:19, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 27.03.17 15:12, Victor Stinner пише:
>>
>> I would like to change struct.Struct.format type from bytes to str. I
>> don't expect that anyone uses this attribute, and struct.Struct()
>> constructor accepts both bytes and str.
>>
>> http://bugs.pyt
12 matches
Mail list logo
