On 3/10/2018 9:58 PM, Anthony Flury via Python-Dev wrote:
All,
I submitted two Pull Requests last Sunday, only a few hours after I
signed the CLA.
When processed properly, a day to a week, usually, a * will appear after
your name on any tracker (bpo) post.
I understand why the 'Knights who
On 3/10/2018 8:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Let's not play games with semantics. The way I see the situation for 2.7
is that EOL is January 1st, 2020, and there will be no updates, not even
source-only security patches, after that date. Support (from the core
devs, the PSF, and python.org
On Mar 10, 2018, at 21:58, Anthony Flury via Python-Dev
wrote:
> I submitted two Pull Requests last Sunday, only a few hours after I signed
> the CLA.
>
> I understand why the 'Knights who say ni' marked the Pull request as 'CLA Not
> Signed' Label at the time I submitted the Pull requests, bu
All,
I submitted two Pull Requests last Sunday, only a few hours after I
signed the CLA.
I understand why the 'Knights who say ni' marked the Pull request as
'CLA Not Signed' Label at the time I submitted the Pull requests, but I
was wondering when the Labels get reset.
How often (if at all
Let's not play games with semantics. The way I see the situation for 2.7 is
that EOL is January 1st, 2020, and there will be no updates, not even
source-only security patches, after that date. Support (from the core devs,
the PSF, and python.org) stops completely on that date. If you want support
f
On 3/10/2018 4:59 PM, Michael Scott Cuthbert wrote:
I notice on https://devguide.python.org that Python 3.5 is in “security”
status with an EOL of 2020-09-13 but Python 2.7 is in “bugfix” and has a
likely earlier EOL.
There is no relation between the two, or between 2.7 and any other
version.
I notice on https://devguide.python.org that Python 3.5 is in “security” status
with an EOL of 2020-09-13 but Python 2.7 is in “bugfix” and has a likely
earlier EOL. Will there be a period where Py2.7 is in security-only status
before hitting EOL? Even if the EOL is set at the last possible da