On 07Dec2018 1340, Terry Reedy wrote:
Simple bugfix example:
Add test to test_mod that fails with TwinkleError.
Posted to issue by Joe Blow.
Make new test pass using the 'underhand' strategy.
The split above is not really necessary, but PR 10245 squashed changes
to 52 files of 15 file types
On 12/7/2018 11:31 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
I would be simpler if it would be possible to have a "patch serie":
list of pull requests,
One can make an 'index issue' with multiple dependencies, each with a
PR. I do this for multiple independent changes to a module or related
modules.
or
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-11-30 - 2018-12-07)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open6904 (+24)
closed 40284 (+50)
total 47188 (+74)
Open issues
Le ven. 7 déc. 2018 à 16:16, Steve Dower a écrit :
> The other changes are either in Windows-only files or tests. The one
> exception is venv, where they are in "if os.name=='nt'" blocks. I also
> pinged our venv expert a few times with no response.
Yeah, the lack of review is an issue in
Le ven. 7 déc. 2018 à 16:42, Steve Dower a écrit :
> As a slight aside, 8 out of 8 buildbot messages on the PR look like
> false positives, and none of the true positives sent a message. What
> happened there?
I don't know why the PR didn't get notifications about the regression.
I got something
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:17 AM Steve Dower wrote:
> Also for not submitting custom builds to all the buildbots (Can we still do
> that? I'm not seeing any UI right now... I did run a number of test
> release builds on the release machine, so I knew that was going to be okay.)
The UX is not
> On 07Dec2018 0716, Steve Dower wrote:
> > It didn't break all Windows buildbots.
> >
> > That said, it's totally my fault for merging and then not watching. Also
> > for not submitting custom builds to all the buildbots (Can we still do
> > that? I'm not seeing any UI right now... I did run a
As a slight aside, 8 out of 8 buildbot messages on the PR look like
false positives, and none of the true positives sent a message. What
happened there?
On 07Dec2018 0716, Steve Dower wrote:
> Thanks for fixing up the buildbots, but please be a little more thorough
> before making publicly
Thanks for fixing up the buildbots, but please be a little more thorough
before making publicly incorrect statements.
The change is 99% adding new files that are not part of Python, but
participate in the build for Windows (and are available and incredibly
useful for everyone). These are
Hi,
I had to revert a change since it broke buildbots. Sadly, I don't have
the bandwidth to investigate the failures and try to fix the change
:-(
A large change has been pushed into the 3.7 and master branches to
"Add Windows App Store package":
"Release Windows Store app containing Python"
10 matches
Mail list logo
