On 5/24/2019 9:09 PM, Random832 wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019, at 15:27, Steve Holden wrote:
Besides which, it would be lovely to have a major release that didn't
involve any pain at all for the majority of users!
Our erstwhile BDFL always eschewed two-digit version identifiers- due
to the
On Thu, May 23, 2019, at 15:27, Steve Holden wrote:
> Besides which, it would be lovely to have a major release that didn't
> involve any pain at all for the majority of users!
>
> Our erstwhile BDFL always eschewed two-digit version identifiers- due
> to the possibility for confusion about
[Tim]
> Key invariants:
> ...
> 2. nfp2lasta[pa->nfreepools] == pa if and only if pa is the only arena
> in usable_arenas with that many free pools.
Ack! Scratch that. I need a nap :-(
In fact if that equality holds, it means that nfp2lasta entry has to
change if pa is moved and pa->prevarena
[Tim]
> I'll note that the approach I very briefly sketched before
> (restructure the list of arenas to partition it into multiple lists
> partitioned by number of free pools) "should make" obmalloc
> competitive with malloc here ...
But it's also intrusive, breaking up a simple linked list into
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 23:14 Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:48 PM Ezio Melotti
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2019, 20:23 Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>>
>>> -cc: committers to avoid crossposting.
>>>
>>
>> +1 (I wanted to include committers, since the announcement about
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:48 PM Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019, 20:23 Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>
>> -cc: committers to avoid crossposting.
>>
>
> +1 (I wanted to include committers, since the announcement about PEP 581
> was posted there too, but it's better to keep the discussion
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 20:23 Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> -cc: committers to avoid crossposting.
>
+1 (I wanted to include committers, since the announcement about PEP 581
was posted there too, but it's better to keep the discussion here)
> I have feedback for roundup as experienced on BPO that
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:18 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> I'm personally viewing it as a first step in addressing the maintenance
> burden we have with such a large stdlib. Christian started this work over a
> year ago and I think it's worth seeing through. After that we should probably
> have a
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:07 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019, 08:08 Ben Cail wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not have the PSF hire someone (or multiple people) to be paid to
>> work on the maintenance burden? This could be similar to the Django
>> fellows:
>>
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:20 AM Inada Naoki wrote:
> When removing libraries from stdlib, can we bundle
> removed libraries and install it like ensurepip does?
>
I think that would require people picking those modules up and maintaining
them. But even then I don't know how easy it would be to
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:45 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 02:06:13PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 1:23 PM Sean Wallitsch <
> > sean.wallit...@dreamworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My apologies for that oversight. My understanding is that many of the
>
-cc: committers to avoid crossposting.
I have feedback for roundup as experienced on BPO that should be
represented within PEP 595 if we are going to have a summary of "improving
roundup for BPO" captured in a PEP (presumably already rejected given 581?
But good to have documented regardless so
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2019-05-17 - 2019-05-24)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open7067 ( +0)
closed 41721 (+88)
total 48788 (+88)
Open issues
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 08:08 Ben Cail wrote:
>
> Why not have the PSF hire someone (or multiple people) to be paid to
> work on the maintenance burden? This could be similar to the Django
> fellows:
> https://www.djangoproject.com/fundraising/#who-is-the-django-fellow. It
> seems like a good
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 03:30, Steve Dower wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Just sharing this here because I think it's important for us to be aware
> of it - I'm not trying to promote or sell anything here :) (Those who
> were at the language summit have seen this already.)
>
> In the next Windows 10 update
[Inada Naoki ]
> For the record, result for 10M nodes, Ubuntu 18.04 on AWS r5a.4xlarge:
I'm unclear on what "nodes" means. If you mean you changed 27M to 10M
in this line:
for token in random_strings(27_000_000):
that's fine, but there are about 40 times more than that `Node`
objects
On 23May2019 2355, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I don't know if this is a good idea or a terrible idea or somewhere in
between, so I'm throwing it out to see if anyone likes it.
Let's add a third option to PEP 594 between "keep" and "remove":
explicitly flagging a module as unmaintained. Unmaintained
On 24May2019 0220, Baptiste Carvello wrote:
Hello,
Le 21/05/2019 à 22:30, Steve Dower a écrit :
[...]
* the Python 3.7 installed from the store will not auto-update to 3.8,
but when 3.8 is released we (Microsoft) will update the redirect to
point at it
* if you pass arguments to the redirect
First, thanks to all the python core devs (and others) who work on
Python - many, many people (myself included) benefit from your work.
Suggestion below...
On 5/23/19 9:02 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 23, 2019, at 14:17, Brett Cannon wrote:
I'm personally viewing it as a first step in
Hello,
Le 21/05/2019 à 22:30, Steve Dower a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> * the Python 3.7 installed from the store will not auto-update to 3.8,
> but when 3.8 is released we (Microsoft) will update the redirect to
> point at it
> * if you pass arguments to the redirect command, it just exits with an
>
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:15 PM Steve Dower wrote:
> On 23May2019 0542, Inada Naoki wrote:
> > 1. perf shows 95% of CPU time is eaten by _PyObject_Free, not kernel
> space.
> > 2. This loop is cleary hot:
> >
>
Le ven. 24 mai 2019 à 09:41, Inada Naoki a écrit :
> For the record, result for 10M nodes, Ubuntu 18.04 on AWS r5a.4xlarge:
>
> $ local/bin/python3 t1.py # default
> 1138.1123778309993 -- end train, start del
> 688.7927911250008 -- end
>
> $ arena-1m/bin/python3 t1.py # Changed ARENA_SIZE to
> > >
> > > It's relatively easy to test replacing our custom allocators with the
> > > system ones, yes? Can we try those to see whether they have the same
> > > characteristic?
> > >
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > PYTHONMALLOC=malloc LD_PRELOAD=/path/to/jemalloc.so python script.py
> >
> > I will try it
When removing libraries from stdlib, can we bundle
removed libraries and install it like ensurepip does?
Ruby does similar thing, called "Gemification".
See https://rubykaigi.org/2017/presentations/hsbt.html
When people don't use venv, scripts importing nntplib
or aifc runs correctly.
When
I don't know if this is a good idea or a terrible idea or somewhere in
between, so I'm throwing it out to see if anyone likes it.
Let's add a third option to PEP 594 between "keep" and "remove":
explicitly flagging a module as unmaintained. Unmaintained modules:
- will raise a warning when
25 matches
Mail list logo
