On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:18:56PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:28:05 +1000
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > So there are no conceptual problems in defining equality for value
> > views. Putting aside efficiency, this is easy to solve.
>
> Right. It's just waiting for someo
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 1:25 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 19:09:35 -0700
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > See the thread 'The trouble with "Easy" issues' in
> > core-mentors...@python.org.
> > Essentially those "easy" issues aren't so easy,
> > and we're starting over.
>
> But how
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 19:09:35 -0700
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> See the thread 'The trouble with "Easy" issues' in
> core-mentors...@python.org.
> Essentially those "easy" issues aren't so easy,
> and we're starting over.
But how do we know that the same mistake won't be done again? :-)
Regards
An
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:28:05 +1000
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> So there are no conceptual problems in defining equality for value
> views. Putting aside efficiency, this is easy to solve.
Right. It's just waiting for someone's PR. However, that doesn't mean
that the current behaviour is senseless