On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 5:00 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I guess at some point I shall have to read the entire thread if I want
> to have an opinion on this feature.
>
Or you could try reading the PEP itself. :-) It'll be quicker than reading
all the commentary, and (unlike the first version) it
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 03:06:46PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> But Mark's repo doesn't replace any of the threads -- it just repeats
> Mark's own arguments, which are exclusively focused on the examples in the
> PEP (it's as if Mark read nothing *but* the examples).
Oh, I'm sorry, I based
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:42 PM Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:36:25AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > Do you have anything new to add to the discussion, or is this 2000
> > lines of rehash?
>
> Having a summary of objections/critiques in one place is far better than
> ex
This function is called from only one place. Maybe there are special
conditions that the one call site already ensures?
I tried to see if there are situations where obj==NULL arises, and there
are. I'm a little unclear on where -- I've narrowed down one case to any
class inheriting from Protocol,
