On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 7:45 PM Kyle Stanley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:19 PM Nguyen Do Minh Duc <
> gd.minhduc1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I find what's new in 3.10 beta in
>> https://docs.python.org/whatsnew/3.10.html
>> It redirected me to
On 22. 07. 21 15:03, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 7/22/21 1:01 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 21. 07. 21 14:18, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> typedef enum {
>> PyLocals_UNDEFINED = -1;
>> PyLocals_DIRECT_REFERENCE = 0,
>> PyLocals_SHALLOW_COPY = 1
>> }
On 7/22/21 1:01 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 21. 07. 21 14:18, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> typedef enum {
>> PyLocals_UNDEFINED = -1;
>> PyLocals_DIRECT_REFERENCE = 0,
>> PyLocals_SHALLOW_COPY = 1
>> } PyLocals_Kind;
>>
>> PyLocals_Kind PyLocals_GetKind(void);
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, 9:47 am Kyle Stanley, wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:19 PM Nguyen Do Minh Duc <
> gd.minhduc1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I find what's new in 3.10 beta in
>> https://docs.python.org/whatsnew/3.10.html
>> It redirected me to
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, 6:01 pm Petr Viktorin, wrote:
>
>
> On 21. 07. 21 14:18, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 21:32, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> >> The proposal assumes that in the future, ``PyLocals_Get``, and thus
> >> ``locals()``, will never gain another kind of return value,
On 21. 07. 21 14:18, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 21:32, Petr Viktorin wrote:
The proposal assumes that in the future, ``PyLocals_Get``, and thus
``locals()``, will never gain another kind of return value, however
unlikely that is.
AFAICS, code that uses this will usually
