On 17/12/21 6:58 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Or a Doctor Who episode. Doctor Who and the Immortal Instances of Doom.
Hmmm... and Guido has a time machine... Is it possible he's
secretly a Time Lord?
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list --
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 2:16 PM Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> The output of "python -h" is 104 lines long now. It was only 51 lines in
> 3.6. 35% of it is about the -X option, and 30% about environment
> variables. Also some lines in the -X option description are too long
> (102 columns). Both
The output of "python -h" is 104 lines long now. It was only 51 lines in
3.6. 35% of it is about the -X option, and 30% about environment
variables. Also some lines in the -X option description are too long
(102 columns). Both topics are "advanced" and mostly interested for
debugging. I suggest to
I think I've posted it as a standalone reply (sorry for my bad mailing list
skills), so linking my thread about potential concerns/reservations:
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/FI4AFU3I25PECARIH2EVKAD5C5RJRE2N/
___
I agree. The same concerns and reservations apply for me.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> Batuhan expresses my concerns better than I could, so I just add my
> agreement.
>
> On 12/18/2021 3:13 PM, Batuhan Taskaya wrote:
>
> > tl;dr: I find it very troubling that we are
Batuhan expresses my concerns better than I could, so I just add my
agreement.
On 12/18/2021 3:13 PM, Batuhan Taskaya wrote:
tl;dr: I find it very troubling that we are going on a path where need
to increase the language complexity (syntax) only in the cause
'easier' typing. So I am opposed
First of all, thank you for authoring a really well-written PEP.
tl;dr: I find it very troubling that we are going on a path where need
to increase the language complexity (syntax) only in the cause
'easier' typing. So I am opposed to this change.
Most of the native typing use cases until now
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:40:57 -
"Jim J. Jewett" wrote:
> Why are Immutability and transitive Immortality needed to share an object
> across interpreters?
Immutability is a functional requirement: you don't want one
interpreter to be able to change the state of another one by mistake.
Unlike
Why are Immutability and transitive Immortality needed to share an object
across interpreters?
Are you assuming that a change in one interpreter should not be seen by others?
(Typical case, but not always true.)
Or are you saying that there is a technical problem such that a change --
