To me Steve nailed it... static type checker = lean and mean...
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 5:03 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:24:40AM +, Malthe wrote:
>
> > But firstly, let me present the idea. It is very simple, that Python
> > should have declarative imports,
>
> I'm no
The migration from bugs.python.org to GitHub is now officially
complete, and all the issues have been successfully transferred.
You can read the full announcement here:
https://discuss.python.org/t/github-issues-are-now-live/14967
Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti
___
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 at 09:31, Daniel Pope wrote:
> I would like to bid again for (import package.module) as an expression.
> Instead of doing the import and assigning package to a variable package it
> would evaluate to the module object package.module.
I like this proposal and I agree with pre
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022, 15:53 Guido van Rossum, wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 2:31 AM Daniel Pope wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 17:44 Guido van Rossum, wrote:
>>
>>> The interesting idea here seems to make "lazy imports" easier to
>>> implement by making them explicit in the code. So far, mos
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 2:31 AM Daniel Pope wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 17:44 Guido van Rossum, wrote:
>
>> The interesting idea here seems to make "lazy imports" easier to
>> implement by making them explicit in the code. So far, most lazy import
>> frameworks for Python have done hacks with `
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 17:44 Guido van Rossum, wrote:
> The interesting idea here seems to make "lazy imports" easier to implement
> by making them explicit in the code. So far, most lazy import frameworks
> for Python have done hacks with `__getattribute__` overrides.
>
The value is more than ease