Dave M.
On 27 Sep 2009, at 07:56, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
As a side note, I would be in favor of dropping the concept of a
mask
from the library, and only support a prefix length.
-1
IPv6 doesn't support masks at all, and even for IPv4, I think there
are conventions (if not RFCs) agai
On 17 Sep 2009, at 15:40, Peter Moody wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:26 AM, DrKJam wrote:
Please can we have the following RFCs added to the references
section that
cover many of the aspects covered by this PEP?
RFC 791 - Internet Protocol
RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Intern
Peter,
I would like to apologise if I have caused you any offense. Please can
we put the animosity behind us and stick to pulling together the best
IP library possible as part of this PEP?
Regards,
Dave M.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@p
