Vinay Sajip wrote:
>The C implementation of the PEP 397-compatible Python Launcher for Windows has
>come along nicely in the last few days, and now reached a point where it would
>benefit from some testing by interested python-dev members.
I've gotten the sources from:
>https://bitbucket.org/vin
Michael Foord wrote:
>The launcher program could thrive without *having* to be part of a
>standard Python install. Offering it separately makes sense even if it
>*is* included. If we do both then users can vote with their feet.
A launcher might be difficult to integrate into the Python installe
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>+1 for a single strategy that is used in all cases. The current
>solution could be phased out across multiple releases, but in the end
>there should be a single approach and no flag. Otherwise some code and
>tools will only support one of the approaches, especially if thi
