Hi,
Anyway, I think we must change CPython to support tools such as perf. Any
thoughts?
Not many thoughts, other than that it would be nice to be able to use a
sampling profiler on Python code. I think this would especially benefit
applications that use libraries written in C, or applications
Hi,
Open an issue on bugs.python.org and attach the patch there (it should also
ask you so sign the contributor agreement, but if not then please also sign
that).
Submitted as http://bugs.python.org/issue22359 , and signed the agreement.
Cheers,
Jonas
Would people be interested in having a parallel version?
See http://bugs.python.org/issue5309
Cool! I'll look into this.
The patch there works well for me. I've made one small update, and
submitted the new version in the bug tracker.
Regarding the other build problem, I might have found
Would people be interested in having a parallel version?
See http://bugs.python.org/issue5309
Cool! I'll look into this.
Just as I was thinking that the parallel build problems are solved,
the issue surfaced again. I've attached a complete, unmodified log to
this mail.
Some notes:
-
Hi again,
the attached Makefile patch seems to fix the parallel build problems.
Is there a chance of getting this into trunk? Should I open an issue
or send the patch somewhere else?
Cheers,
Jonas
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Jonas Wagner jonas.wag...@epfl.ch wrote:
Would people
Hi,
Thanks for your comments! I've done more tests on a new machine and, for
better or worse, was no longer able to reproduce the issue. Parallel
compilation now works fine; I'll keep collecting output from make, and
would post it here if the problem appears again.
One additional issue appeared,
Hi,
what’s people’s experience with compiling cpython using multiple jobs
(e.g., make -j 8)?
In my case, I sometimes experience build errors that happen when using -j,
whereas the single-job build always works. I haven’t tracked this down in
detail, though… here’s an extract from a sample log:
