On 10.10.2014 14:05, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 10 October 2014 10:50, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Is MinGW fully compatible with MSVS ABI? I read that it reuses the
>> MSVCRT, but I don't know if it's enough. I guess that a full ABI
>> compatibility means more than just using the C library, calling
>> c
On 17.11.2014 23:09, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
> Hi,
> ...
> The PEP-418 is about performance counters, but there is no mention o
> Anyway, I think we must change CPython to support tools such as perf.
> Any thoughts?
>
there are some patches available adding systemtap and dtrace probes,
which s
won't this need python compiled with gcc 5.1 to have any effect? Which
compiler version was used for the benchmark?
the issue that negated most computed goto improvements
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39284) was only closed
very recently (r212172, 9f4ec746affbde1)
__
.register_alloc = trace_alloc
tracercontext.register_free = trace_free
tracercontext.data = mycontext
PyMem_SetTracer(&tracercontext)
Regards,
Julian Taylor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyt
On 06.06.2014 04:18, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 05/06/14 22:51, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> This gets evaluated as:
>>
>> tmp1 = a + b
>> tmp2 = tmp1 + c
>> result = tmp2 / c
>>
>> All these temporaries are very expensive. Suppose that a, b, c are
>> arrays with N bytes each, and N is l
On 06.06.2014 04:26, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> I'd be a little nervous about whether anyone has implemented, say, an
>> iadd with side effects such that you can tell whether a copy was made,
>> even if the object being copied is immediately destroyed.
>
> I can think of at l
On 02.08.2014 08:35, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 8/2/2014 1:57 AM, Allen Li wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:51:54PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> No. We just can't put all possible use cases in the docstring. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Andrea Griffini wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 04.08.2014 22:22, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>
>
>
> Sat Aug 2 12:11:54 CEST 2014, Julian Taylor wrote (in
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135623.html ) wrote:
>
>
>> Andrea Griffini wrote:
>
>>>However sum([[1,2,3],[4
The values on macos for these variables still look wrong in 3.3.1rc1:
./configure --prefix=/Users/jtaylor/tmp/py3.3.1 --enable-shared
on macosx-10.8-x86_64
sys.version_info(major=3, minor=3, micro=1, releaselevel='candidate',
serial=1)
SO .so
EXT_SUFFIX .so
SHLIB_SUFFIX 0
the only correct on
