[Python-Dev] Re: Switching to Discourse

2022-07-15 Thread Peter Wang via Python-Dev
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:33 AM Skip Montanaro wrote: > Email protocols were long ago standardized. As a result, people can use > any of a large number of applications to read and organize their email. To > my knowledge, there is no standardization amongst the various forum tools > out there. >

[Python-Dev] Re: Have virtual environments led to neglect of the actual environment?

2021-02-24 Thread Peter Wang
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:50 PM Mike Miller wrote: > I never understood the fear around version conflicts. With binary extension modules, version conflicts lead to (at best) runtime segfault and (at worst) subtle *data* bugs that return incorrect results. There are also deeper concerns around s

[Python-Dev] Re: Thank you Larry Hastings!

2020-10-06 Thread Peter Wang
Thank you Thank you, Larry! 3.4 and 3.5 were so critical to getting the scientific & pydata data community over the 2to3 hump. -Peter On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:43 PM Barry Warsaw wrote: > They say being a Python Release Manager is a thankless job, so the Python > Secret Underground (PSU), which

[Python-Dev] Re: Should set objects maintain insertion order too?

2019-12-20 Thread Peter Wang
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:57 PM Tim Peters wrote: > > It's not obvious to me that insertion order is even the most obvious or > > most commonly relevant sort order. I'm sure it is for Larry's program, > but > > often a work queue might want some other order. Very often queues > > might instead,

Re: [Python-Dev] Increasing the C-optimized pickle extensibility

2019-04-27 Thread Peter Wang
I strongly second not breaking backwards compatibility and interoperability, especially for persistent artifacts, unless there is a *REALLY* good reason. A potential unintended side effect of such breakages is that it slows down adoption of the new version. -Peter On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:27 A

Re: [Python-Dev] "Deprecation" of os.system in favor of subprocess?

2018-10-24 Thread Peter Wang
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:31 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 09:34:34AM -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote: > > > Simply put, there is no valid use case for os.system over subprocess > > If you depreciate and then remove os.system, all you will do is force > people to re-invent it,

Re: [Python-Dev] [Distutils] PEP 365 (Adding the pkg_resources module)

2008-03-24 Thread Peter Wang
On Mar 20, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> I'll note that I use easy_install *only* to work in *non-system* >> locations: if I want to install Python packages to /usr/lib/ >> python2.x/, >> I use the standard system installer, e.g. 'apt-get install >> python-frobnatz'. > > This is p