Hi everyone,
Sorry if this was proposed already. I looked here
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0622/#alternatives-for-constant-value-pattern,
search for "idea to make lookup semantics the default". I saw that a few
symbols like $ and ? were proposed, and I thought that maybe the annotation
syn
Okay, next time I'll ask on python-ideas. (I do hope that no one there will
be angry that I'm posting a question there rather than an idea...)
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Ram Rachum wrote:
>
>>
Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Ram Rachum wrote:
>
>> You see, Antoine, *you* know that it's better asked on python-ideas
>> because you know it doesn't exist in Python, therefore it's an idea fo
ing
newbie questions.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/24/2014 11:32 AM, Ram Rachum wrote:
>
>> Question: Why is there no str.rreplace in Python?
>>
>
> Ram, this list is for discussing the development of the next few releases
> of CPython. Gener
Ram.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:32:17 +0200
> Ram Rachum wrote:
> > Question: Why is there no str.rreplace in Python?
>
> What would it do?
> (also, I think such questions are better asked on python-ideas)
>
> Regar
Question: Why is there no str.rreplace in Python?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I don't like how in Python 3.x, you can't do this:
lambda (x, y): whatever
It's quite useful in Python 2
if I understand correctly, it's a side effect of such packed arguments not
being allowed in function definitions. (i.e. def instead of lambda)
Can you please refer me to the original dis
Hi everyone,
Take a look at this question:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16122435/python-3-how-do-i-use-bytes-to-bytes-and-string-to-string-encodings/16122472?noredirect=1#comment23034787_16122472
Is there really no way to use base64 that's as short as:
b'whatever'.encode('base64')
Be
