Re: [Python-Dev] New syntax for 'dynamic' attribute access

2007-02-16 Thread Sergio Correia
A few of you have expressed concern about how would that look to a newbie. Being one, this is what I think: - The idea sounds good. Setattr and getattr seems both unpythonic and illegible. - please.(dont_torture) = me(with_dots,that_look,like.(function),calls). Ok, so the dot _is_ needed in order

Re: [Python-Dev] New syntax for 'dynamic' attribute access

2007-02-12 Thread Sergio Correia
A few of you have expressed concern about how would that look to a newbie. Being one, this is what I think: (again, newbie alert) - The idea sounds good. Setattr and getattr seem kinda unpythonic and difficult to read. - please.(dont_torture) = me(with_dots,that_look,like.(function),calls). Ok,