> I've never seen environment markers being used or supported
> in the wild.
>
> I'm not against modernizing the format, but given that version 1.2
> has been out for around 8 years now, without much following,
> I think we need to make the implementation bit a requirement
> before accepting the P
> (btw, nothing to do with this discussion, Nick, but it appears your
> RHEL buildbot is offline)
>
> Regards
Btw rpm build and packaging can be done on the suse build service: it is a very
complete (and free) service.
https://build.opensuse.org
___
How about folding them???
I did it, now I don't need a power supply anymore :O
On Thu 20/12/12 19:52, Trent Nelson tr...@snakebite.org wrote:
> No problemo'. If only all the other Snakebite servers could fit in
> my palm and run off 0.25A.
___
Pytho
Mmmm,
interesting point and worth a discussion about different roles (developer,
system
admin, final user etc.) having different needs.
I believe distutils is used as tool primarily (setup.py bdist_rpm/msi to create
installable objects, setup.py bdist_sdist to manage the source code etc.): this
I'll give you that number(?) but ...
mercurial, docutils, jinjia2 pygments, sphinx, lxml, nose, cherrypy, django,
pyqt ...
all they don't need/use setuptools: that 25% left is quite an interesting field
to play in.
If setuptools was "significant packaging innovation" do you think people
wouldn
+1
Distutils is good enough: it could be better but for what is required
(essentially copying files and creating packages installers) is fine. The only
corner case is an absolute pain in the neck is in the cross compile scenario.
Currently I don't have *any* need for "auto" tools (setuptools and
