On 27 cze 2013, at 00:51, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2013 03:12, "Łukasz Langa" wrote:
> > This was a mention of an alternative possible syntax. I don't feel it was
> > worth keeping this particular one while not discussing any other
> > alternatives at all. If you'd rather keep this infor
On 27 Jun 2013 03:12, "Łukasz Langa" wrote:
>
> On 26 cze 2013, at 18:18, R. David Murray wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:07 +0200, lukasz.langa <
python-check...@python.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> -Deferred; see
>>> +Rejected; see
>>> +http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013
On 26 cze 2013, at 18:18, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:07 +0200, lukasz.langa
> wrote:
>> -Deferred; see
>> +Rejected; see
>> +http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021610.html
>> +
>> +This PEP has been deferred since 2006; see
>> htt
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:07 +0200, lukasz.langa
wrote:
> -Deferred; see
> +Rejected; see
> +http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021610.html
> +
> +This PEP has been deferred since 2006; see
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/06071
