On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> On 6/3/2014 3:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>
> 2014-06-03 23:38 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico :
>
> Is this an intentional change? And if so, is it formally documented
> somewhere? I do
On 6/3/2014 3:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2014-06-03 23:38 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico :
Is this an intentional change? And if so, is it formally documented
somewhere? I don't recall seeing anything about it, but my
recollection doesn't mean
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2014-06-03 23:38 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico :
>> Is this an intentional change? And if so, is it formally documented
>> somewhere? I don't recall seeing anything about it, but my
>> recollection doesn't mean much.
>
> Yes, it's intentional. See
On 6/3/2014 5:38 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> I'm helping out with the micropython project and am finding that one
> of their tests fails on CPython 3.5 (fresh build from Mercurial this
> morning). It comes down to this:
>
> Python 3.4.1rc1 (default, May 5 2014, 14:28:34)
> [GCC 4.8.2] on linux
>
Hi,
2014-06-03 23:38 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico :
> Is this an intentional change? And if so, is it formally documented
> somewhere? I don't recall seeing anything about it, but my
> recollection doesn't mean much.
Yes, it's intentional. See the issue for the rationale:
http://bugs.python.org/issue
I'm helping out with the micropython project and am finding that one
of their tests fails on CPython 3.5 (fresh build from Mercurial this
morning). It comes down to this:
Python 3.4.1rc1 (default, May 5 2014, 14:28:34)
[GCC 4.8.2] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
