Re: [Python-Dev] [Catalog-sig] accept the wheel PEPs 425, 426, 427

2012-11-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 13.11.12 03:04, schrieb Nick Coghlan: On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com mailto:dho...@gmail.com wrote: I think Metadata 1.3 is done. Who would like to czar? (Apologies for the belated reply, it's been a busy few weeks) I'm happy to be BDFL delegate for

Re: [Python-Dev] [Catalog-sig] accept the wheel PEPs 425, 426, 427

2012-11-13 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 13.11.2012 10:51, Martin v. Löwis wrote: Am 13.11.12 03:04, schrieb Nick Coghlan: On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com mailto:dho...@gmail.com wrote: I think Metadata 1.3 is done. Who would like to czar? (Apologies for the belated reply, it's been a busy few

Re: [Python-Dev] [Catalog-sig] accept the wheel PEPs 425, 426, 427

2012-11-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 13.11.12 11:26, schrieb M.-A. Lemburg: Note that signing such distribution files can be handled outside of the wheel format PEP. It just way to complex and out of scope for the wheel format itself. Also note that PGP/GPG and the other signing tools work well on any distribution file. There's