On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:39:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
> Thank
Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:39:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment i
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
>>> efforts. My brief comment is below.
>>>
>>> On W
I talked to Fijal about my project last night, the result is that
basically the project as is, is not that interesting because the means
to execute the benchmarks on multiple interpreters are currently
missing.
Another point we talked about was that porting the benchmarks would
not be very useful
On 4/8/2011 11:32 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
an interpreter. For the purposes of benchmarking, the distinction
between compiler and interpreter, as some one said above, 'dubious'.
I agree. We should be comparing 'Python execution systems'. My
impression is that some of what Cython does in te
>
>
> >
> >
> >> and will you complain if we don't provide a custom cython
> >> hacks? (like providing extra type information)
> >
> > I don't consider providing extra type information a hack. Remember that
> they
> > are only used for additional speed-ups in cases where the author is
> smarter
> >
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>> Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and
>> run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to include is goi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
> Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and
> run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to include is going
> to make it hard to make progress. We can have fun with
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 13:37:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython
should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing Cython and
adding
two lines to site.py.
can you provide a simple comman
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
> Thanks
On 08/04/2011 11:18, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel
wrote:
[snip...]
So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython
should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing Cython
and adding
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment i
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
>>> efforts. My brief comment is below.
>>>
>>> On W
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote:
1. Definition of the benchmark suite.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord
> wrote:
>> On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord
> wrote:
> > On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord
> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
>>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>
> Right now,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>
*some* good benchmarks in place (and the pypy ones are good ones).
>
Agreed. The PyPy ones are good.
>
> So I'm still with Jesse on this one. If there is any "discussion phase" as
> part of the Gsoc project it should be very strictly boun
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord
mailto:fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk>> wrote:
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seavermailto:tsea...@palladion.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>
>>> Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test
the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongsid
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seaver wrote:
Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test
the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another
- cython *is not* an interpreter.
Cython is out of scope f
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seaver wrote:
> >
> > Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test
> > the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another
> > - cython *is not* an interpreter.
> >
> > Cython is out of scope for this.
>
> Why is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 04:28 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>> Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
>> efforts. My brief comment is below.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 6,
On 06/04/2011 17:52, DasIch wrote:
Hello Guys,
I would like to present my proposal for the Google Summer of Code,
concerning the idea of porting the benchmarks to Python 3.x for
speed.pypy.org. I think I have successfully integrated the feedback I
got from prior discussions on the topic and I wou
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
> efforts. My brief comment is below.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote:
>>
>> 1. Definition of the benchmark suite. This will entail con
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote:
>
> 1. Definition of the benchmark suite. This will entail contacting
> developers of Python implementations (CPython, PyPy, Ir
Hello Guys,
I would like to present my proposal for the Google Summer of Code,
concerning the idea of porting the benchmarks to Python 3.x for
speed.pypy.org. I think I have successfully integrated the feedback I
got from prior discussions on the topic and I would like to hear your
opinion.
Abstra
27 matches
Mail list logo