On 31 Jul 2011, at 02:26, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:11:08PM +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote:
-.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout])
+.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout],
source_address=None)
The [, timeout] now looks
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:17:00 +0100
Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
I found that [, timeout] bit odd too. But is not mentioning that as
timeout=None when it is timeout=socket._GLOBAL_DEFAULT_TIME
technically inaccurate?
It does mean that users will expect to be able to
Hi,
On 30/07/2011 5.58, senthil.kumaran wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/26839edf3cc1
changeset: 71617:26839edf3cc1
parent: 71613:018e14a46454
user:Senthil Kumaransent...@uthcode.com
date:Sat Jul 30 10:56:50 2011 +0800
summary:
Fix closes Issue11281 -
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:11:08PM +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote:
-.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout])
+.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout],
source_address=None)
The [, timeout] now looks weird there, and it would be better to
convert it