On Mar 5, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 08:36:04 -0800
> Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Tim Delaney
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If those were to be removed from .hgignore then there would be a high
>>> likelihood of someone doing "hg addremove
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 08:36:04 -0800
Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Tim Delaney
> wrote:
>
> > If those were to be removed from .hgignore then there would be a high
> > likelihood of someone doing "hg addremove" and inadvertently tracking them.
> > The purpose of .hgigno
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Tim Delaney wrote:
> If those were to be removed from .hgignore then there would be a high
> likelihood of someone doing "hg addremove" and inadvertently tracking them.
> The purpose of .hgignore is to prevent inadventently tracking files that
> shouldn't be tracked
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 00:54:39 +1100, Tim Delaney
wrote:
> If those were to be removed from .hgignore then there would be a high
> likelihood of someone doing "hg addremove" and inadvertently tracking them.
> The purpose of .hgignore is to prevent inadventently tracking files that
> shouldn't be tr
On 6 March 2011 00:44, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:01:02 -0800, Santoso Wijaya <
> santoso.wij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As a mercurial user, I thank you for this effort! One question, where/how
> do
> > I send suggestion to what to add into .hgignore file? In particular, I
> f
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:01:02 -0800, Santoso Wijaya
wrote:
> As a mercurial user, I thank you for this effort! One question, where/how do
> I send suggestion to what to add into .hgignore file? In particular, I found
> these dynamically generated files after a build in Windows (3.2) that
> probabl
