Have we reached final agreement on the 2.5 release schedule? The last
message was on Feb 15, which said:
alpha 1: May 6, 2006 [planned]
alpha 2: June 3, 2006 [planned]
alpha 3: July 1, 2006 [planned]
beta 1: July 29, 2006 [planned]
beta 2: August 26, 2006 [planned]
rc
If anything, we're probably going to do it earlier even.
All schedules are tentative, BTW; the PSF is not responsible for
losses due to schedule changes. :-)
--Guido
On 3/8/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have we reached final agreement on the 2.5 release schedule? The last
message was on
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:24:57PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0356.html
There is at least one SF bug, namely #1333982 Bugs of the new AST
compiler, that in my humble opinion absolutely needs to be fixed before
the release, even though I won't hide that I have
It is critical, but I hadn't seen the bug report. Feel free to assign
AST bugs to me and assign them a 5 priority.
Jeremy
On 2/17/06, Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:24:57PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0356.html
There is
Actually, it might be easier to assign separate bugs. A number of the
old bugs appear to have been fixed. It's hard to track individual
items within a bug report.
Jeremy
On 2/17/06, Jeremy Hylton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is critical, but I hadn't seen the bug report. Feel free to assign
On 2/17/06, Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:24:57PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0356.html
There is at least one SF bug, namely #1333982 Bugs of the new AST
compiler, that in my humble opinion absolutely needs to be fixed
Neal Norwitz wrote:
What do people think about that? There are still a lot of features we
want to add. Is this ok with everyone? Do you think it's realistic?
My view on schedules is that they need to exist, whether they are
followed or not. So having one is orders of magnitude better than
We still need a release manager. No one has heard from Anthony.
It is the peak of the summer down here. Perhaps he is lucky enough
to be enjoying it away from computers for a while?
=Tony.Meyer
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 21:24 -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
We still need a release manager. No one has heard from Anthony. If
he isn't interested is someone else interested in trying their hand at
it? There are many changes necessary in PEP 101 because since the
last release both python and
