On Oct 25, 2013, at 07:54 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Since the default build settings work, that sounds reasonable. Perhaps
>include a note somewhere that targeting a more recent ABI may involve
>copying the 2.7 readline.c?
I'll probably add issue 18458 to the announcement and release page. That w
On 25 Oct 2013 06:42, "Barry Warsaw" wrote:
>
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 01:12 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
>
> >Yes, this problem also affects 2.6. There are some mitigating factors.
The
> >support for libedit on OS X is only enabled when building for an OS X
10.5 or
> >later ABI because in earlier releases
On Oct 24, 2013, at 01:12 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
>Yes, this problem also affects 2.6. There are some mitigating factors. The
>support for libedit on OS X is only enabled when building for an OS X 10.5 or
>later ABI because in earlier releases, the readline emulation of libedit was
>judged too b
In article <20131024094436.230220bf@anarchist>,
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 02:11 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
> >I don't know where any other potential 2.7.6 or 3.3.3 issues stand at this
> >point. But I'd like Benjamin and Georg to propose an aggressive schedule so
> >we can get these
