Re: [Python-Dev] A request for PEP announcement format [was: PEP 570]

2019-03-29 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:28 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2019-03-29 04:08, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > In this case, it's here: > > > > > > https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-570-Python-Positional-Only-Parameters/1078 > > So, are we supposed to discuss PEPs on discuss.python.org now? That's

Re: [Python-Dev] A request for PEP announcement format [was: PEP 570]

2019-03-28 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2019-03-29 04:08, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: In this case, it's here: > https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-570-Python-Positional-Only-Parameters/1078 So, are we supposed to discuss PEPs on discuss.python.org now? That's fine for me, should I create a thread like that for PEP 580 too?

Re: [Python-Dev] A request for PEP announcement format [was: PEP 570]

2019-03-28 Thread Jonathan Goble
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:11 PM Stephen J. Turnbull < turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > > > https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-570-Python-Positional-Only-Parameters/1078 > > (sorry, case changed for emphasis so clicking won't work) > Clicking actually did work for me. Not only is that

[Python-Dev] A request for PEP announcement format [was: PEP 570]

2019-03-28 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
A proponent writes: > We have submitted PEP 570 for consideration to the steering > council: I would like to ask *future* proponents to please include the title explicitly in the first mention. (This is not a criticism of the previous post. How could he know I would write this?) In this case