Re: [Python-Dev] About the future of multi-process Python

2019-02-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:19:14 -0600 Neil Schemenauer wrote: > On 2019-02-06, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > For maximum synergy between these initiatives and the resulting APIs, > > it is better if things are done in the open ;-) > > Hi Antoine, > > It would be good if we could have some feedback fro

Re: [Python-Dev] About the future of multi-process Python

2019-02-07 Thread Neil Schemenauer
On 2019-02-06, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > For maximum synergy between these initiatives and the resulting APIs, > it is better if things are done in the open ;-) Hi Antoine, It would be good if we could have some feedback from alternative Python implementations as well. I suspect they might want to

Re: [Python-Dev] About the future of multi-process Python

2019-02-06 Thread Steve Dower
On 06Feb2019 0906, Antoine Pitrou wrote: For the record there are number of initiatives currently to boost the usefulness and efficiency of multi-process computation in Python. One of them is PEP 574 (zero-copy pickling with out-of-band buffers), which I'm working on. Another is Pierre Glaser's

[Python-Dev] About the future of multi-process Python

2019-02-06 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello, For the record there are number of initiatives currently to boost the usefulness and efficiency of multi-process computation in Python. One of them is PEP 574 (zero-copy pickling with out-of-band buffers), which I'm working on. Another is Pierre Glaser's work on allowing pickling of dyn