Re: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?

2009-06-29 Thread Jesse Noller
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Jesse Noller writes: > >  > Any thoughts? Does anyone hate this idea with the power of a thousand suns? > > If somebody has the power of 1000 Suns at their disposal, maybe they > can contribute a few buildbots? > > Wishful-thinking-is-t

Re: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?

2009-06-29 Thread Collin Winter
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Jesse Noller wrote: > Something that's been helping me squirrel out "wacky" and "fun" bugs > in multiprocessing is running the tests in a loop - sometimes hundreds > of times. Right now, I hack this up with a bash script, but I'm > sitting here wondering if adding a

[Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?

2009-06-29 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Jesse Noller writes: > Any thoughts? Does anyone hate this idea with the power of a thousand suns? If somebody has the power of 1000 Suns at their disposal, maybe they can contribute a few buildbots? Wishful-thinking-is-the-order-of-the-day-ly y'rs,

[Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?

2009-06-29 Thread Jesse Noller
Something that's been helping me squirrel out "wacky" and "fun" bugs in multiprocessing is running the tests in a loop - sometimes hundreds of times. Right now, I hack this up with a bash script, but I'm sitting here wondering if adding a "loop for x iterations" option to regrtest.py would be usefu