On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 18:13, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat our own dog food and went with
roundup.
That's
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:13, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat our own dog food and went with
roundup.
I'm
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:58, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Looking at their pricing model, we don't need permission; public repos
can have unlimited contributors. Plus bitbucket supports CNAMEs so we
would also be able to still have hg.python.org for accessing the
repos.
The trick
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:03:29 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
Anyway, I don't think using Bitbucket buys us much. It could be nice
to keep a mirror there for redundancy and because it might make
contributing slightly easier for non-committers, but it won't allow
doing all
Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl writes:
Still, I think the flexibility of self-hosting (in terms of hooks and
extension -- for example the one that would allow lookup by SVN rev)
should win out here.
Not only the flexibility, but the autonomy. Hosting the source code on
systems either paid
Am 29.09.2010 09:03, schrieb Dirkjan Ochtman:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:13, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:35, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Can't we rewrite the history when converting from svn to hg to use real names
instead of logins?
I've been doing that since the start, look at the test repo on hg.p.o.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On 2010-09-29, at 11:50 , Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:03:29 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
Anyway, I don't think using Bitbucket buys us much. It could be nice
to keep a mirror there for redundancy and because it might make
contributing slightly easier for
On 01:13 am, st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat our own dog food and went with
roundup.
I'm wondering if they'd be similarly
On 9/29/2010 6:32 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl writes:
Still, I think the flexibility of self-hosting (in terms of hooks and
extension -- for example the one that would allow lookup by SVN rev)
should win out here.
Not only the flexibility, but the autonomy.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:36 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 01:13 am, st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat our own
On Sep 28, 2010, at 09:13 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat our own dog food and went with
roundup.
I was an advocate for JIRA at
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 16:43, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
Do we expect Mercurial to require more, less, or about the same amount of
babysitting as the current Subversion repository? I would think no more and
Subversion hasn't been much of a problem.
Yeah, should be about the same.
On 2010-09-29, at 15:26 , Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:36 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 01:13 am, st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
Do we expect Mercurial to require more, less, or about the same amount of
babysitting as the current Subversion repository?
The ongoing effort is to manage write access; this is not going to
change with Mercurial.
With a hosted service, you still need someone who gives write
permissions to
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.dewrote:
Of course, with a hosted service, you often can't run hooks at all,
so the effort to write them is also reduced :-)
It should be easy to write an automated script that pulls the latest changes
from the hosted service
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Daniel Stutzbach
dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com wrote:
Obviously, it would not be possible to write hooks that reject changesets
Of course, this is one of the more interesting ways to use hooks.
Since there's no current expectation that running our own will be
I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial
hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on
JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat our own dog food and went with
roundup.
I'm wondering if they'd be similarly interested in supporting our Hg
server. Or
18 matches
Mail list logo
