Le 06/02/2013 05:03, Chris Jerdonek a écrit :
> I asked this earlier, but didn't see a response. Is the freeze
> stated somewhere like in a PEP?
It’s part in notes from the PyCon 2010 Language Summit, part in
unwritten policy in the heads of people involved in distutils bugs these
last years.
>
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Chris Jerdonek
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> Le 03/02/2013 07:48, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
>>> I vote for removing the "distutils is frozen" principle.
>> I’ve also been thinking about that. There have been two exceptions to
>> t
On 03.02.2013 19:33, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> I vote for removing the "distutils is frozen" principle.
> I’ve also been thinking about that. There have been two exceptions to
> the freeze, for ABI flags in extension module names and for pycache
> directories. When the stable ABI was added and MvL wa
I did think that updating distutils to have basic support for the packaging
PEPs was a decent idea, but then it wound up being more or less rewritten
entirely like I've been cajoled into doing with PEP 426 (Metadata). I don't
know whether distutils(1) can survive the minimum changes required for
wh
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Le 03/02/2013 07:48, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
>> I vote for removing the "distutils is frozen" principle.
> I’ve also been thinking about that. There have been two exceptions to
> the freeze, for ABI flags in extension module names and for pyc
Hi,
I don’t have a problem with Nick improving the PEP and deciding on its
acceptance.
Le 03/02/2013 07:48, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:34:36 +
> Paul Moore wrote:
>> So it's perfectly possible to use wheels right now, without the pip
>> integration. But the pip develope
