On 14 November 2015 at 08:57, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Damien George wrote:
>
>>1. What is the true intent of PEP 394 when only Python 3 is installed? Is
>>"python" available or not to run scripts compatible with 2.x and 3.x?
>>
>>2. Is it possible to
On Nov 13, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Damien George wrote:
>1. What is the true intent of PEP 394 when only Python 3 is installed? Is
>"python" available or not to run scripts compatible with 2.x and 3.x?
>
>2. Is it possible to write a shebang line that supports all variations of
>Python installations
Hi python-dev,
We have a Python script that runs correctly under Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3+.
It is executed on a *nix system using the "python" executable (ie not
python2 or python3 specifically). This works just fine for systems that
have Python 2 installed, or 2 and 3, or just 3 and symlink