(Sending again - I didn't mean to drop python-dev from the cc list when
I originally sent this via the gmail web interface)
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl
mailto:dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
Right, it wasn't intended as that harsh... but it does come with
On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:43:57 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
In general, this reminds me of the ipaddr discussions. I read through
the thread from March real quick to see if there was reasoning there
why this package should be an exception from the normal standards
track
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:51, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I disagree that a stdlib module is a dead module. It is perfectly
possible to augment the API with new functionality without breaking
compatibility. You can also deprecate old APIs if you want.
Right, it wasn't intended
