Talin wrote:
/ I don't know how you define simple. In order to be able to have
// separate GILs you have to remove *all* sharing of objects between
// interpreters. And all other data structures, too. It would probably
// kill performance too, because currently obmalloc relies on the GIL.
/
Talin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I don't know how you define simple. In order to be able to have
separate GILs you have to remove *all* sharing of objects between
interpreters. And all other data structures, too. It would probably
kill performance too, because
On Nov 4, 2006, at 3:49 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Notice that at least the following objects are shared between
interpreters, as they are singletons:
- None, True, False, (), , u
- strings of length 1, Unicode strings of length 1 with ord 256
- integers between -5 and 256
How do you deal
On 11/5/06, James Y Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 4, 2006, at 3:49 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Notice that at least the following objects are shared between
interpreters, as they are singletons:
- None, True, False, (), , u
- strings of length 1, Unicode strings of length 1 with
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I don't know how you define simple. In order to be able to have
separate GILs you have to remove *all* sharing of objects between
interpreters. And all other data structures, too. It would probably
kill performance too, because currently obmalloc relies on the GIL.
Robert schrieb:
Would it be a possibilty in next Python to have the lock separate for
each Interpreter instance. Thus: have *interpreter_lock separate in
each PyThreadState instance and only threads of same Interpreter have
same GIL? Separation between Interpreters seems to be enough. The
repeated from c.l.p : Feature Request: Py_NewInterpreter to create
separate GIL (branch)
Daniel Dittmar wrote:
robert wrote:
I'd like to use multiple CPU cores for selected time consuming Python
computations (incl. numpy/scipy) in a frictionless manner.
Interprocess communication is
On 11/3/06, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
repeated from c.l.p : Feature Request: Py_NewInterpreter to createseparate GIL (branch)Daniel Dittmar wrote: robert wrote: I'd like to use multiple CPU cores for selected time consuming Python
computations (incl. numpy/scipy) in a frictionless
