On 6/30/06, Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote: 1) Is removing 'file' from the builtins dict in PyInterpreterState (and maybe some other things) going to be safe enough to sufficiently hide 'file' confidently (short of someone being stupid in their C extension
module and
Hi Brett,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 11:48:36AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
1) Is removing 'file' from the builtins dict in PyInterpreterState (and
maybe some other things) going to be safe enough to sufficiently hide 'file'
confidently (short of someone being stupid in their C extension module
On 6/30/06, Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brett,On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 11:48:36AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: 1) Is removing 'file' from the builtins dict in PyInterpreterState (and maybe some other things) going to be safe enough to sufficiently hide 'file'
confidently (short of someone
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Brett Cannon wrote:
On 6/30/06, Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
object.__subclasses__()
[..., type 'file']
Maybe this one won't work if __subclasses__ is forbidden, but in general
I think there *will* be a way to find this object.
Yeah, that's been my
On 6/30/06, Ka-Ping Yee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Brett Cannon wrote: On 6/30/06, Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: object.__subclasses__() [..., type 'file']
Maybe this one won't work if __subclasses__ is forbidden, but in general I think there *will* be a way to find
Brett Cannon wrote:
1) Is removing 'file' from the builtins dict in PyInterpreterState (and
maybe some other things) going to be safe enough to sufficiently hide
'file' confidently (short of someone being stupid in their C extension
module and exposing 'file' directly)?
2) Changing
I have gotten some questions from people about why cripple 'file' (and probably 'socket' if they cared), asking whey I didn't just remove the 'file' built-in from built-ins. Problem is that I still want to provide some protection for files.
So an option I have been thinking of is making sure
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 11:48:36AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
My worry, as has been from the start, is containing 'file'. The ``del
__builtins__`` bug for 'rexec' started me as skittish towards hiding stuff
from the built-in namespace. And knowing how easy it tends to be to get at
objects
On 6/29/06, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 11:48:36AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: My worry, as has been from the start, is containing 'file'.The ``del __builtins__`` bug for 'rexec' started me as skittish towards hiding stuff
from the built-in namespace.And knowing
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
This thought was sparked by the piece on failure-oblivious computing
in today's Linux Weekly News about this paper:
http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi04/tech/rinard.html.
The paper is also available from one of the authors at
10 matches
Mail list logo
