Hi Collin,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:19:26AM -0500, Collin Winter wrote:
> iter() is part of every syntactic construction that takes an iterator
> argument (for, listcomps, gencomps, ...). Should it go in operator as
> well?
Historically, things that have a slot go in 'operator'. So that would
Yes.
On 3/12/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/11/07, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Collin,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:53:45PM -0600, Collin Winter wrote:
> > > bool() and abs() aren't syntax, so I would never look in operator.
> >
> > abs() is not syntax b
On 3/11/07, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Collin,
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:53:45PM -0600, Collin Winter wrote:
> > bool() and abs() aren't syntax, so I would never look in operator.
>
> abs() is not syntax but bool() is part of every syntactic construction
> that takes a truth va
Hi Collin,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:53:45PM -0600, Collin Winter wrote:
> bool() and abs() aren't syntax, so I would never look in operator.
abs() is not syntax but bool() is part of every syntactic construction
that takes a truth value argument (if, while, and, ...)
A bientot,
Armin
___
On 3/7/07, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Collin Winter]
> >> I don't suppose you've changed your mind about removing operator.truth
> >> and operator.abs in the seven months since this discussion?
>
> [GvR]
> >No, though I think that operator.truth should be renamed to operator.bo
They do, by emphasizing the relationship with special methods.
On 3/7/07, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Collin Winter]
> >> I don't suppose you've changed your mind about removing operator.truth
> >> and operator.abs in the seven months since this discussion?
>
> [GvR]
> >No, tho
[Collin Winter]
>> I don't suppose you've changed your mind about removing operator.truth
>> and operator.abs in the seven months since this discussion?
[GvR]
>No, though I think that operator.truth should be renamed to operator.bool.
>
>I like the idea that for each built-in op there's a callable
