[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hasn't trac already happened in the sense that it's installed (by Tim Parkin
> on the Pollenation website) and in use by the website maintainers? Seems
> the only major hurdle is the extraction of history from SF.
That isn't actually the case. Test data would be availab
Martin> Nobody has stepped forward and said "I make trac happen".
Hasn't trac already happened in the sense that it's installed (by Tim Parkin
on the Pollenation website) and in use by the website maintainers? Seems
the only major hurdle is the extraction of history from SF.
Skip
__
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> so what's the advantage of a freely hosted Atlassian setup compared
> to a freely hosted Trac setup ?
>
> I'm obviously missing something here.
One thing that you are *obviously* missing (there might be more):
Nobody has stepped forward and said "I make trac happen". Witho
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 16:20 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
> I'm not saying it's out of the question for Python, I'm saying that it's
> out of the question for most open-source projects, which don't have the
> money or don't want to spend the money on a mere bug tracker, and that
> this may be the rea
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 10:39 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
>> Perhaps that Jira is commercial, so it is out of the question for most
>> open-source Python applications.
>
> Sorry, I don't follow. Why is a commercial product out of the question
> for Python?
What I answered t
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 10:39 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Perhaps that Jira is commercial, so it is out of the question for most
> open-source Python applications.
Sorry, I don't follow. Why is a commercial product out of the question
for Python?
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 09:55 +0200, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> so what's the advantage of a freely hosted Atlassian setup compared
> to a freely hosted Trac setup ?
Dunno. I'm sure both will accomplish the job and both will be better
than the current situation. I've used Jira and Confluence for almo
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
>
>> I'm in favor of having Atlassian setup a system to be used for 3k. It
>> would be completely experimental and could be completely thrown away
>> which should be made clear to Atlassian if we were to do this. I
>> would use the system for evaluation
On 3/29/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
>
> > I'm in favor of having Atlassian setup a system to be used for 3k. It
> > would be completely experimental and could be completely thrown away
> > which should be made clear to Atlassian if we were to do this. I
> >
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I'm in favor of having Atlassian setup a system to be used for 3k. It
> would be completely experimental and could be completely thrown away
> which should be made clear to Atlassian if we were to do this. I
> would use the system for evaluation.
so what's the advantage of
On 3/29/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Watch out for the parochialism! I like Python as much as the next guy
> > (probably more :-) but I'm sensitive to choosing the best solution.
>
> you better make that "good enough", or we'll be stuck with SF for an
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Watch out for the parochialism! I like Python as much as the next guy
> (probably more :-) but I'm sensitive to choosing the best solution.
you better make that "good enough", or we'll be stuck with SF for an-
other hundred years.
> The language choice should only be us
12 matches
Mail list logo
