On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
(I'm actually not sure if *nix package managers allow multiple repositories
or not, but from the way people talk about them, it always sounds like a
distribution also provides a repository of additional packages).
Am 29.10.14 20:34, schrieb Glenn Linderman:
New package manager from M$... article here
http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-oneget-a-linux-style-package-management-framework.
I've looked at it, but only by reading its code, not trying it out.
Some notes.
First, what is Chocolatey? It's a
Most likely, OneGet won't replace pip/PyPI, any more than apt or yum
does; but it may be worth having Python itself available that way.
That might simply mean having someone package up Python and put it on
an appropriate server, or maybe python.org could end up hosting a
repo.
Python is
Most likely, OneGet won't replace pip/PyPI, any more than apt or yum
does; but it may be worth having Python itself available that way.
That might simply mean having someone package up Python and put it on
an appropriate server, or maybe python.org could end up hosting a
repo.
Python is
On 10/30/2014 7:30 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Most likely, OneGet won't replace pip/PyPI, any more than apt or yum
does; but it may be worth having Python itself available that way.
That might simply mean having someone package up Python and put it on
an appropriate server, or maybe python.org
New package manager from M$... article here
http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-oneget-a-linux-style-package-management-framework.
It seems doubtful that M$ will eliminate .msi (their obscure, hard to
configure and use, installation format), so it seems doubtful that the
addition of OneGet
On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
New package manager from M$... article here
http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-oneget-a-linux-style-package-management-framework.
It seems doubtful that M$ will eliminate .msi (their obscure, hard to
configure
