Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Dan Stromberg wrote:
Did the import semantics change in cpython 3.3a4?
I used to be able to import treap.py even though I had a treap
directory in my cwd. With 3.3a4, I have to rename the treap
directory to see treap.py.
On 6/8/2012 6:41 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Dan Stromberg wrote:
Did the import semantics change in cpython 3.3a4?
I used to be able to import treap.py even though I had a treap
directory in my cwd. With 3.3a4, I have to
Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
On 7/5/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
Have you and/or the Jython community made up your mind about this? The
thread seems to have disappeared after you posted (or perhaps it
continued only on jython-dev, which I don't read?).
The thread
On 6/25/06, Frank Wierzbicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the untrimmed conversation, but I've cc'ed jython-dev, my
comments are at the bottom.
On 6/12/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/12/06, Samuele Pedroni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
Python
On 7/5/06, Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 18:12, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I'm asked
occasionally what the status of Jython is; people point out that
the last release was 2.1 many years ago and the website has no news
since early 2005; thy're afraid that
In that case, why not post a news item saying this? The website is
probably the first place people look...
I think any news other than here is the beta -- follow this link to
download it would be kind of a waste at this point. And that will
come when I finish __slots__, subclassable type, and
On 7/5/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
Have you and/or the Jython community made up your mind about this? The
thread seems to have disappeared after you posted (or perhaps it
continued only on jython-dev, which I don't read?).
The thread pretty much stopped there. I
Frank That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
Frank authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
Frank fortunately continues to watch the checkins and prods me when I
Frank go in the wrong direction.
Does that make Samele the DBPV (Dictator
In Italian that would be DBAV (Dittatore benevolo a vita)...;-)
Alex
On 7/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
Frank authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
Frank fortunately
On 7/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
Frank authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
Frank fortunately continues to watch the checkins and prods me when I
Frank go in the
Skip Does that make Samele the DBPV (Dictator benevolo per vita)? ;-)
Alex In Italian that would be DBAV (Dittatore benevolo a vita)...;-)
Damn Google Translator. File a bug report for me please Alex (or Guido or
Jeremy or Neal or ...). ;-)
Skip
On 7/5/06, Frank Wierzbicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
Frank authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
Frank fortunately continues to
Sorry for the untrimmed conversation, but I've cc'ed jython-dev, my
comments are at the bottom.
On 6/12/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/12/06, Samuele Pedroni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
Python and Jython import semantics differ on how sub-packages
On 6/12/06, Samuele Pedroni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
Python and Jython import semantics differ on how sub-packages should be
accessed after importing some module:
Jython 2.1 on java1.5.0 (JIT: null)
Type copyright, credits or license for more information.
the difference in Jython is deliberate. I think the reason was to mimic
more the Java style for this, in java fully qualified names always work.
In jython importing the top level packages is enough to get a similar
effect.
This is unlikely to change for backward compatibility reasons, at
Bill Janssen wrote:
If it's Python, it has to comply with the Python specification,
regardless of what Java does.
what specification ?
/F
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
/F writes:
what [Python] specification?
Good meta-point.
Bill
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
this is mildy insulting, to the people that spent time trying to find
the best compromises between various issues and keep jython alive.
Sorry, didn't mean to disparage that work.
Bill
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Python and Jython import semantics differ on how sub-packages should be accessed after importing some module:Jython 2.1 on java1.5.0 (JIT: null)Type copyright, credits or license for more information.
import xml xml.dommodule xml.dom at 10340434Python 2.4.2 (#67, Sep 28 2005, 12:41:11) [MSC
Fabio Zadrozny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Jython 2.1 on java1.5.0 (JIT: null)
Python 2.4.2 (#67, Sep 28 2005, 12:41:11) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
Jython 2.1 intends to match Python 2.1, I believe.
Python 2.2, which I still have loaded, matches Python 2.4 in the behavior
20 matches
Mail list logo
