On 05.06.16 21:24, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
On Jun 4, 2016, at 1:08 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
1. http://bugs.python.org/issue27129
Make the bytecode more 16-bit oriented.
I don' think this should be done. Adding the /2 and *2 just complicates the
code and messes with
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 1:08 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> Following the converting 8-bit bytecode to 16-bit bytecode (wordcode), there
> are other issues for improving the bytecode.
>
> 1. http://bugs.python.org/issue27129
> Make the bytecode more 16-bit oriented.
I don'
On 04/06/16 10:02, Eric Snow wrote:
You should get in touch with Mark Shannon, while you're working on
ceval. He has some definite improvements that can be made to the eval
loop.
See http://bugs.python.org/issue17611 for my suggested improvements.
I've made a new comment there.
Cheers,
Mark.
You should get in touch with Mark Shannon, while you're working on
ceval. He has some definite improvements that can be made to the eval
loop.
-eric
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Following the converting 8-bit bytecode to 16-bit bytecode
It's not on the list but I'm hoping to convince Dino to work on END_FINALLY
to be a bit more sane.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016, 01:17 Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Following the converting 8-bit bytecode to 16-bit bytecode (wordcode),
> there are other issues for improving the
Following the converting 8-bit bytecode to 16-bit bytecode (wordcode),
there are other issues for improving the bytecode.
1. http://bugs.python.org/issue27129
Make the bytecode more 16-bit oriented.
2. http://bugs.python.org/issue27140
Add new opcode BUILD_CONST_KEY_MAP for building a dict