Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-17 Thread John J Lee
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback Why this one? John ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe:

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
John J Lee wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback Why this one? Nice catch, this makes no sense. The patch even applies almost cleanly. I'll update it and set the others to pending, so further objections can

[Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid; However, I've been mistaken

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 2009-02-16 18:50, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
M.-A. Lemburg wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter Thanks, Marc-Andre! If anyone else feels like closing some of these issues, go ahead (no need to report back, I'll find it out later). My rather bureaucratic approach is just to avoid a possible

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Terry Reedy
Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid;

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote: Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; -

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Daniel (ajax) Diniz writes: M.-A. Lemburg wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter Thanks, Marc-Andre! If anyone else feels like closing some of these issues, go ahead (no need to report back, I'll find it out later). My rather bureaucratic