[Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid; However, I've been mistaken abou

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 2009-02-16 18:50, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: > Hi, > I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: > - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; > - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; > - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the iss

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter Thanks, Marc-Andre! If anyone else feels like closing some of these issues, go ahead (no need to report back, I'll find it out later). My rather bureaucratic approach is just to avoid a possible trig

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Terry Reedy
Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid; How

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: >> - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; >> - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; >> - the O

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-16 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Daniel (ajax) Diniz writes: > M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > >> http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter > > Thanks, Marc-Andre! > > If anyone else feels like closing some of these issues, go ahead (no > need to report back, I'll find it out later). My rather burea

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-17 Thread John J Lee
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback Why this one? John ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe:

Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
John J Lee wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: >> >> http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback > > Why this one? Nice catch, this makes no sense. The patch even applies almost cleanly. I'll update it and set the others to pending, so further objections