On 29 May 2015 22:50, "Donald Stufft" wrote:
>
> This might be something that people could have done before with C/C++ but
with
> a nicer language behind it... but that's kind of the point? You don't
need to
> be stuck with a terrible language to get a nice single file executable
anymore,
> you ca
Speaking about distribution I believe Pip is the simplest way of
distributing. I have used some freezing tools in the past such cxfreeze but
with more complex projects they start being hard to manage. Now instead of
saying people to goto an url, download and put in the path I just say: pip
install
On May 29, 2015 at 2:58:28 AM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 29 May 2015 9:48 am, "Donald Stufft" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 28, 2015 at 7:40:26 PM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > One thing I've seen more than once is that new development happens
> > >
On 29 May 2015 9:48 am, "Donald Stufft" wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 28, 2015 at 7:40:26 PM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > One thing I've seen more than once is that new development happens
> > in Python
> > > until the problem is understood, then the code is ported to Go.
> > Pyth
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Go seems to be popular where I work. It is replacing Python in a number of
> places, although Python (and especially Python 3) is still a very important
> part of our language toolbox.
>
> There are several reasons why Go is gaining populari
On May 28, 2015 at 7:40:26 PM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > One thing I've seen more than once is that new development happens
> in Python
> > until the problem is understood, then the code is ported to Go.
> Python's
> > short path from idea to working code, along with it
On 29 May 2015 2:16 am, "Barry Warsaw" wrote:
>
> Go seems to be popular where I work. It is replacing Python in a number
of
> places, although Python (and especially Python 3) is still a very
important
> part of our language toolbox.
>
> There are several reasons why Go is gaining popularity. S
On May 28, 2015, at 11:48 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>And the very same place where you are working is investing in getting shared
>libraries working for Go. Single binaries may be popular for distributing end
>user applications, but definitely not for distributing a core OS or a SDK.
Yep, I ment
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2015 23:48:59 +0200
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> []
>
>> And the very same place where you are working is investing in getting
>> shared libraries working for Go. Single binaries may be popular for
>> distributing
Hello,
On Thu, 28 May 2015 23:48:59 +0200
Matthias Klose wrote:
[]
> And the very same place where you are working is investing in getting
> shared libraries working for Go. Single binaries may be popular for
> distributing end user applications, but definitely not for
> distributing a core OS
On May 28, 2015 at 5:50:32 PM, Matthias Klose (d...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 06:13 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > Go seems to be popular where I work. It is replacing Python in a number of
> > places, although Python (and especially Python 3) is still a very important
> > part of our langu
On 05/28/2015 06:13 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Go seems to be popular where I work. It is replacing Python in a number of
> places, although Python (and especially Python 3) is still a very important
> part of our language toolbox.
>
> There are several reasons why Go is gaining popularity. Singl
On Thu, May 28, 2015, 12:14 Barry Warsaw wrote:
Go seems to be popular where I work. It is replacing Python in a number of
places, although Python (and especially Python 3) is still a very important
part of our language toolbox.
There are several reasons why Go is gaining popularity. Single-f
On 28 May 2015 at 17:47, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Single-file binaries are indeed important. (Though in most cases they don't
> have to be totally stand-alone -- they can depend on a system python and its
> stdlib. At least in typical datacenter setups.) Have people looked at PEX (a
> format deve
On 28 May 2015 at 17:13, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 28, 2015, at 10:37 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>>I think docker is a pretty crummy answer to Go’s static binaries. What I would
>>love is for Python to get:
>>
>>* The ability to import .so modules via zipzimport (ideally without a
>>temporary
Single-file binaries are indeed important. (Though in most cases they don't
have to be totally stand-alone -- they can depend on a system python and
its stdlib. At least in typical datacenter setups.) Have people looked at
PEX (a format developed by Twitter) or Pants (which seems to be an
open-sour
Go seems to be popular where I work. It is replacing Python in a number of
places, although Python (and especially Python 3) is still a very important
part of our language toolbox.
There are several reasons why Go is gaining popularity. Single-file
executables is definitely a reason; it makes de
17 matches
Mail list logo
