There's an open PEP-356 issue for update the icons to the newer
shinier ones for Unix. As far as I can see, there's the 14x15 GIF
images used for Idle and the documentation. Note that for me at least,
idle comes up without an icon _anyway_.
Are there any others I missed?
Anthony
--
Anthony
Anthony Baxter wrote:
There's an open PEP-356 issue for update the icons to the newer
shinier ones for Unix. As far as I can see, there's the 14x15 GIF
images used for Idle and the documentation. Note that for me at least,
idle comes up without an icon _anyway_.
Are there any others I
Anthony Baxter wrote:
There's an open PEP-356 issue for update the icons to the newer
shinier ones for Unix. As far as I can see, there's the 14x15 GIF
images used for Idle and the documentation. Note that for me at least,
idle comes up without an icon _anyway_.
A pyfav.(gif|png)
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
Anthony Baxter wrote:
There's an open PEP-356 issue for update the icons to the newer
shinier ones for Unix. As far as I can see, there's the 14x15 GIF
images used for Idle and the documentation. Note that for me at least,
idle comes up without an icon
I know the .desktop files have become fairly standard, but are these our
responsibility or does that rest with the distributions/integrators? (I'm
not objecting, but I'm not sure what the right thing really is since Python
is an interpreter, not a desktop application.)
The same anal argument
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Georg Brandl wrote:
In case we add a Python .desktop file (as proposed in patch #1353344),
we'll need some PNGs in /usr/share/icons. A patch for Makefile.pre.in
is attached.
Independent of whether this should be done at all, I have a comment on
the patch. Instead of
