Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3127 (Integer Literal Support and Syntax): %o and %b

2008-03-24 Thread Eric Smith
Guido van Rossum wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been double checking the PEP 3127 implementation in py3k and the backport I did to 2.6. The PEP says this about the % operator: The string (and unicode in 2.6) % operator will have 'b' format

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3127 (Integer Literal Support and Syntax): %o and %b

2008-03-21 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been double checking the PEP 3127 implementation in py3k and the backport I did to 2.6. The PEP says this about the % operator: The string (and unicode in 2.6) % operator will have 'b' format specifier added for

[Python-Dev] PEP 3127 (Integer Literal Support and Syntax): %o and %b

2008-03-18 Thread Eric Smith
I've been double checking the PEP 3127 implementation in py3k and the backport I did to 2.6. The PEP says this about the % operator: The string (and unicode in 2.6) % operator will have 'b' format specifier added for binary, and the alternate syntax of the 'o' option will need to be updated