python-dev
I am being forced to support multiple versions of python on Windows
platforms. I have been using PEP 397 and the execution of *.py files works
great. Thank you!!
My problem is idle. The various versions of idle have the same problem as
the various versions of python. We were using an ed
Hi,
2011/11/1 David Bailey
> python-dev
>
> I am being forced to support multiple versions of python on Windows
> platforms. I have been using PEP 397 and the execution of *.py files works
> great. Thank you!!
> My problem is idle. The various versions of idle have the same problem as
> the vari
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:25:28 +0100
"Amaury Forgeot d'Arc" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/11/1 David Bailey
>
> > python-dev
> >
> > I am being forced to support multiple versions of python on Windows
> > platforms. I have been using PEP 397 and the execution of *.py files works
> > great. Thank you!!
> >
Amaury,
Maybe this belongs on some blog. I don't know. I was responding to PEP 397,
seems to me that idle was left out.
I am not being critical of what you guys are doing. I love python. As a
developer, I see a problem. You are correct, I have no technical issue. I
do believe it is still a develop
On 11/1/2011 2:20 PM, David Bailey wrote:
population of windows users of python, make idle easier to use or fix
print in 3.X or both.
print is fixed in 3.x. This is not the place to argue otherwise. If you
want to rant againt print as function, go to python-list.
If one looks up 'print' in
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Now, it would be better if the icons were labelled by version. I thought
> that had been agreed on, and I intend to request it again.
It has, it really just needs a patch put forward with specific
installer changes in it.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Ni
