Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round 3)

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Eric Snow wrote: > The following code demonstrates roughly equivalent semantics for the > default behavior:: > >class Meta(type): >def __prepare__(cls, *args, **kwargs): Shouldn't this be wrapped with a classmethod

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round 3)

> From: Eric Snow > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 11:02 PM > To: Émanuel Barry > Cc: Python-Dev > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace > (round 3) > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Émanuel Barry <vgr...@live.ca> wrote:

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round 3)

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Émanuel Barry wrote: >> From: Eric Snow >> 1. if ``__definition_order__`` is defined in the class body then it >> must be a ``tuple`` of identifiers or ``None``; any other value >> will result in ``TypeError`` > > Why not just any

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round 3)

> From: Eric Snow > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 10:37 PM > To: Python-Dev; Guido van Rossum > Subject: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round > 3) > The only change to the original proposal > has been that a manually set __definition_or

[Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round 3)

I've updated the PEP to reflect feedback up to this point. The reception has been positive. The only change to the original proposal has been that a manually set __definition_order__ must be a tuple of identifiers or None (rather that using the value as-is). All other updates to the PEP have