I am not sure what you are trying to propose here. The slice object
isn't special, it's just a regular built-in type.
The idea is to have slice objects be generators. You could make a
slice like 1:10:2 , and that would make a slice object which could be
used as a list index. The list would
Forrest Voight wrote:
I am not sure what you are trying to propose here. The slice object
isn't special, it's just a regular built-in type.
The idea is to have slice objects be generators. You could make a
slice like 1:10:2 , and that would make a slice object which could be
used as a
Forrest Voight wrote:
Slice objects that are produced in a list index area would be different,
and optionally the syntax for slices in list indexes would be expanded
to work everywhere.
Something like this was quite close to getting in a while
back, but it was eventually dropped. Anyone
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Forrest Voight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure what you are trying to propose here. The slice object
isn't special, it's just a regular built-in type.
The idea is to have slice objects be generators. You could make a
slice like 1:10:2 , and
This would simplify the handling of list slices.
Slice objects that are produced in a list index area would be different,
and optionally the syntax for slices in list indexes would be expanded
to work everywhere. Instead of being containers for the start, end,
and step numbers, they would be
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Forrest Voight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would simplify the handling of list slices.
Slice objects that are produced in a list index area would be different,
and optionally the syntax for slices in list indexes would be expanded
to work everywhere.
