On 4 September 2016 at 20:57, Christian Heimes wrote:
> On 2016-09-01 23:15, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> 2016-08-31 22:31 GMT+02:00 Christian Heimes :
>>> https://bugs.python.org/issue27744
>>> Add AF_ALG (Linux Kernel crypto) to socket module
>>
>> This patch adds a new socket.sendmsg_afalg() method
On 2016-09-01 23:15, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2016-08-31 22:31 GMT+02:00 Christian Heimes :
>> https://bugs.python.org/issue27744
>> Add AF_ALG (Linux Kernel crypto) to socket module
>
> This patch adds a new socket.sendmsg_afalg() method on Linux.
>
> "afalg" comes from AF_ALG which means "Addres
2016-08-31 22:31 GMT+02:00 Christian Heimes :
> https://bugs.python.org/issue27744
> Add AF_ALG (Linux Kernel crypto) to socket module
This patch adds a new socket.sendmsg_afalg() method on Linux.
"afalg" comes from AF_ALG which means "Address Family Algorithm". It's
documented as "af_alg: User-s
On 2016-08-31 22:31, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 7 patches for 3.6 ready for merging. The new features were
> discussed on Security-SIG and reviewed by Victor or GPS. The patches
> just need one final review and an ACK. The first three patches should
> land in 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5, too.
>
Hi,
I have 7 patches for 3.6 ready for merging. The new features were
discussed on Security-SIG and reviewed by Victor or GPS. The patches
just need one final review and an ACK. The first three patches should
land in 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5, too.
http://bugs.python.org/issue26470
Make OpenSSL module com
Here is a review of some patches:
* [ 1673759 ] '%G' string formatting doesn't catch same errors as '%g'
This patch is done, has been reviewed and works as advertised. Just
needs someone to commit it I think.
* [ 1100942 ] datetime.strptime constructor added
Doesn't apply cleanly, emits compile
OK, here's the patch I'd like to direct attention to:
http://python.org/sf/1704134
[ 1704134 ] minidom Level 1 DOM compliance
This is only the first step toward DOM Level 1 compliance. It fixes
the stuff that's easy to fix.
Here are the patch reviews. I put more detailed comments in the SF
On 12/5/05, John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm hoping one of those nice people who offered 'review 5 get 1 free'
> might look at a patch of mine.
Oooh, ooh, do I count?!? (Well, you can drop the nice part. :-)
> http://python.org/sf/1157027
Checked in to 2.5.
> http://python.org/sf/
Hi
I attended the bug day on Sunday and reviewed six bugs/patches (1212287,
1215184, 1115886, 1372650, 1216942, 878275). So, I'm hoping one of those
nice people who offered 'review 5 get 1 free' might look at a patch of
mine. Test, documentation, and explanatory comments in the tracker are
all t
