Hi Phillip,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:29:48PM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
This idea would address the needs of external maintainers (having a single
release history) while still allowing Python developers to modify the code
(if the external package is in Python's SVN repository).
It's
As requested in PEP 360, please inform me of any issues you find so they
can be corrected in the standalone package and merged back to the trunk.
I just wasted time cutting an 0.1.1 release of the standalone wsgiref
package only to find that it doesn't correspond to any particular point in
the
On 6/11/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As requested in PEP 360, please inform me of any issues you find so they
can be corrected in the standalone package and merged back to the trunk.
I just wasted time cutting an 0.1.1 release of the standalone wsgiref
package only to find that
At 09:04 AM 6/12/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
IOW I think PEP 360 is an unfortunate historic accident, and we would
be better off without it. I propose that we don't add to it going
forward, and that we try to get rid of it as we can.
4 of the 6 modules in PEP 360 were added to Python in
